Resources

A growing body of academic research, spanning business schools, nursing programs, sport management departments, and, most recently, computer-science and human-computer-interaction labs building AI interview systems, shows that structured mock-interview practice measurably improves confidence, reduces anxiety, and improves readiness for the real conversation that follows. The newest wave of that research looks specifically at AI-driven and virtual mock interview tools, finding effects consistent with (and in some studies, an extension of) decades of research on traditional mock interviewing.

Every recruiting class has more talented athletes in it than a program has roster spots to fill. When two prospects post comparable times, comparable stats, and comparable highlight reels, something else decides who gets the call, the offer, or the scholarship. Recruiting-industry data and college coaches themselves are remarkably consistent about what that something else is: not one more tenth of a second, but character, coachability, and how a prospect communicates.

Practical steps for teens, and the parents coaching them, grounded in the work of leading adolescent development researchers.

Most conversations about preparing young people for interviews focus narrowly on the college admissions interview or the first job interview: a single, high-stakes event to rehearse for once. That framing understates the real shape of the problem. Between the first day of high school and the end of senior year of college, a young person accumulates a long, largely unplanned series of moments in which they must present themselves for evaluation or speak up for what they need: tryouts, scholarship interviews, coach conversations, teacher meetings, job interviews, internship rounds, and dozens of everyday moments of self-advocacy in between.

93% of people feel nervous before an interview. A recruiting call is no different. These are the questions real college coaches ask most often, so your athlete hears them here first.